TOUGH SPOT: Stadium Idea Faces Difficult Reality

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

A piece of prime real estate needs a new tenant, a high school needs a new stadium and the city could solve a 22-year-old problem. But the potential match-up has several hurdles.

From eyesore to promised land!

“I get excited when I think ‘Boy, that could be us someday down there,’” says Des Moines Roosevelt activities director, Kelley Hood.

A rotting plant on 38 acres of contaminated soil, but…

“It’s got great potential, there’s no doubt about it,” says Des Moines city councilwoman, Christine Hensley.

The old Diko plant’s name was only mentioned as a potential site for a potential football stadium for Roosevelt High School, but that was enough.

“A lot of community excitement, a lot of city excitement in something like that,” Hood nods.

He loves the idea of a true home stadium - a more even playing field.

“Our kids," Hood says, "when we go out and play at some of the suburban schools, they see the stuff they have.”

And how could city leaders not like the idea?

“It’s been a problem sight for us and we would love to see something else happen with it," says Hensley, "some development.”

This proposal makes sense from plenty of angles, but there is a catch - the site. There might not be a more difficult one in Des Moines to develop.

“This would be at the top of the list and it would not be for the faint of heart,” Hensley says.

It’s contaminated. It’s been locked up in lawsuits since 1995. And it’s owned by Titan International, and cantankerous CEO, Maurice Taylor.

“He’s just never been eager to work with the city or other parties that have expressed interest in the land,” Hensley shrugs.

Titan did pay over $10,000 in property taxes this year. A high school stadium would be tax exempt. Enough to send this idea back to the drawing board.

“It may never be feasible," says Des Moines superintendent, Tom Ahart. "But it may, and if it were ever to be feasible, we want to be in position to take advantage of it.”

The site could be all wrong but the idea of a new stadium for Des Moines could still be alright. And for now the conversation could still be worth having.


  • Des Moines Weather (@WeatherAardvark)

    I really do not see a problem here, Ames has a baseball field on the site of the former ISU nuclear reactor. Prairie Trails houslng development is sitting on the site of the former ISU Uranium enrichment facility and they only had to remove 80 truck loads of toxic soil that they dumped in abandoned mine shafts in Dallas County. North High sits on old Dico waste site and has test wells that samples are evaluated monthly. So what is the big problem with the Roosevelt stadium site.
    I see nothing wrong with Roosevelt traveling off site to a location away from their school to play in a stadium area that floods when we have that problem, to expend a huge sum of money , after all it is the Rough Riders the districts team of privilege.

    Why not do the right thing, Certainly there must be property somewhere on good soil that has no hazards, isn’t going to cost a ton of money to remove those buildings, haul the waste away and decontaminate the soil. Perhaps in hindsight, saving the Rice Field might have given Roosevelt a site for their games, or perhaps, they could relocate to the DM Waterworks area for their field.

    To spend that anticipated chunk of money when high school classrooms are over crowded, football only serves a small number of people anyway, whereas a new school building might be what the district needs. How about tearing down Hubbell and moving it to a new building in the area, such as the Greenwood land or the Bergman academy area. Replace the heating plant at Roosevelt and use the new chunk of property for the stadium there,.

    I just don’t see why we want our kids being on contaminated flood plain lands at a high cost for the sake of a narrow served event.

  • ) L

    This is just south of downtown, no? What a terrible location for a High School anything. It would choke off any potential expansion and development for the urban center.

Comments are closed.