Severe Weather Warnings

HOT SEAT: DAS Director Denies ‘Hush Money’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

It was the moment Iowa Democrats had been waiting to get.

Thursday morning Department of Administrative Services Director Mike Carroll sat before lawmakers in the packed, stuffy old Supreme Court chambers inside the state Capitol. He answered their questions for two hours about confidential agreements given to dismissed state workers.

Carroll told lawmakers several times he made a mistake by using the settlements. He said no one in Governor Terry Branstad’s office, the governor or anyone else, knew about the settlements beforehand. “There would have been no reason why they would have known that or should have known that.”

And Carroll said he now understands the governor doesn’t believe in them. Carroll also supports changing the law to ban confidential agreements in the future.

“Why did you need confidential agreements? What was there to hide?” asked Senator Janet Petersen, a Des Moines Democrat.

Carroll said he only signed off on four of the 24 agreements that used confidentiality clauses. But he said he had agreed to them at the time because he was negotiating the terms of those four workers’ departures. And confidentiality assured that workers wouldn’t talk to others who hadn’t yet completed the terms of their final settlement.

Carroll denied that dismissed workers were offered more money, or “hush money” as some Democrats and workers have alleged, so they wouldn’t divulge issues in their workplace.

When asked after the hearing whether Petersen believed Carroll’s responses, she responded, “I’m not going to say.”

Petersen said she wants to hold more hearings to bring in other department heads who signed off on the confidential agreements.



  • Coffee Pot

    After finding out Culver did it, they should have dropped it. Why would the governors know? Culver didn’t see 1.2 million in wages to 3 people going out, so why is this different. The governor can’t do everybody’s job or he wouldn’t need department heads.
    They want Branstad out but they keep up and ol Hatch isn’t even going to be noticed on the ballet. And the deal with Narcisse, just what did they think he was running for? Pizza man of the month? Just because all of the papers didn’t say what he was running for was about political to say the least. Kind of looks like these judges need voted out too.

  • JPenny

    Terry is scrambling as the plot thickens. It is not an easy political life when you’ve been caught with your hand in the cookie jar and claiming ignorance in the matter is certainly not going to help.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.